Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of pick up transfer impressions performed with two different types of trays

Autores

  • Aline Trem
  • Gustavo Holtz Galvão
  • Allan Fernando Giovanini
  • Eduardo Christiano Caregnatto de Morais
  • Carla Castiglia Gonzaga
  • Enio Marcos da Silva

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21726/rsbo.v10i2.906

Palavras-chave:

dental implants; dental impression technique; dental casts.

Resumo

The success of implant-supported prostheses is related to
the passive union between the prostheses’ connections and the implants,
so it is necessary to obtain an accurate working cast. Objective: To
evaluate the accuracy of the transfer impressions of implants performed
with individual acrylic resin trays and conventional trays using polyvinyl
siloxane. Material and methods: To carry out the transfer impressions,
a master cast with four external hexagon implants parallel to each
other was used. Five impressions were made with individual acrylic
resin trays and five other impressions with modified conventional
trays, opened in the region of the implants. The linear measurements
between the implants were made with a digital caliper with an accuracy
of 0.01 mm and the results were statistically evaluated �(alpha = 5%)�.
Results: For the points AB and BC, the measurements obtained
with the individual trays were statistically similar to the master cast.
For the points CD and DA no statistical differences among the three
groups were observed. Conclusion: Given the obtained results and the
methodology used, it can be concluded that the impressions performed
with individual trays presented higher accuracy compared to the ones
obtained with conventional trays.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Downloads

Publicado

2014-06-30

Como Citar

Aline Trem, Gustavo Holtz Galvão, Allan Fernando Giovanini, Eduardo Christiano Caregnatto de Morais, Carla Castiglia Gonzaga, & Enio Marcos da Silva. (2014). Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of pick up transfer impressions performed with two different types of trays. Revista Sul-Brasileira De Odontologia, 10(2), 128–34. https://doi.org/10.21726/rsbo.v10i2.906