Bonding performance of a self-adhering flowable composite to indirect restorative materials

Autores

  • Rubens Nazareno Garcia
  • Caroline Silvestri Silva
  • Giovana Gochinski Silva
  • Guilhermo Mocellin
  • José Ozelame
  • Laís Fracasso
  • Matheus Bernhardt Ozelame
  • Reinaldo Francisco do Nascimento
  • Ana Cristina Rocha Gomes

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21726/rsbo.v11i1.793

Palavras-chave:

ceramics; composite resins; metal ceramic alloys; shear strength.

Resumo

Simplified restorative materials may be a logical
next step for dental manufacturers. Objective: The aim of this
study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of a self-adhering
flowable composite to four substrates used in indirect technique.
Material and methods: Twenty-four samples (5 mm wide, 15 mm
length and 2 mm thick / six blocks each substrate) were prepared
in the dental prosthetic laboratory. The following materials were
used: ceromer (SR Adoro/AD, Ivoclar Vivadent), leucite ceramic (IPS
Empress Esthetic/EE, Ivoclar Vivadent), zirconia ceramic (ZirCAD/ZI,
Ivoclar Vivadent); metal ceramic alloy (Fit Cast SB/ME, Talladium
do Brasil). Samples of each substrate were divided into two groups (n = 3). Two flowable composites (Control/FF – Filtek Z350 XT
Flow/3M ESPE, and the self-adhering/DF – Dyad Flow/Kerr) were
bonded to the four substrates. Four Tygon tubings were positioned
over each sample, which were filled in with the composites FF and
DF, and visible light-cured for 20 s. The tubings were removed to
expose the specimens (12 per group) in format of cylinders and
samples were stored in distilled water at 37±2°C for one week.
After this period, each sample was attached to testing machine
and the specimens were submitted to the shear bond strength test
at speed of 1.0 mm/min, until failure. The results were analyzed
by two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (p < 0.05). Results: The means
(SD) were (in MPa): AD + FF = 34.4 ± 4.9; AD + DF = 28.2 ±
4.2; EE + FF = 29.7 ± 5.8; EE + DF = 32.3 ± 6.9; ZI + FF =
23.2 ± 5.4; ZI + DF = 8.5 ± 1.5; ME + FF = 28.9 ± 4.2; ME +
DF = 31.7 ± 4.5. Conclusion: The efficacy of flowable composites
is material-dependent. The self-adhering composite provided lower
bond strength only to zirconia ceramic. Comparing with the control
group, Dyad Flow showed lower bond strength to the ceromer and
zirconia ceramic.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Downloads

Publicado

2015-03-30

Como Citar

Rubens Nazareno Garcia, Caroline Silvestri Silva, Giovana Gochinski Silva, Guilhermo Mocellin, José Ozelame, Laís Fracasso, … Ana Cristina Rocha Gomes. (2015). Bonding performance of a self-adhering flowable composite to indirect restorative materials. Revista Sul-Brasileira De Odontologia, 11(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.21726/rsbo.v11i1.793