Bond strength of dentin submitted to bleaching and restored with different materials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21726/rsbo.v9i3.1002Palavras-chave:
aesthetics; bleaching; adhesives; composite resinsResumo
The use of adhesive composite resin with fluoride
and with greater fluidity can be favorable to the restoration of the
palatal/lingual face of teeth submitted to internal bleaching. Objective:
This study evaluated the bond strength of adhesive systems and
composite resins to bleached dentin. Material and methods: Forty
maxillary canines were sectioned to obtain 40 blocks (5 x 5 mm) of
intracoronary dentin. The fragments were included and bleached with
37% carbamide peroxide. After 7 days, the specimens were divided
into two groups according to the adhesive system: with (Optibond
Solo Plus) and without (Single Bond) fluoride and subdivided into 2
subgroups (n = 10) according to the composite resin: microhybrid
(Z250) and flowable (Z350). The restoration was carried out through
a bipartite matrix. After 24 hours, the specimens were subjected to
shear bond strength test. The data (MPa) were analyzed by ANOVA
and Tukey test (α = 0.05). Results: The best results (p < 0.05)
were obtained for fluoridated adhesive (7.44 ± 2.35) compared with
that without fluoride (5.36 ± 2.01); flowable resin (7.76 ± 2.23)
performed better than microhybrid resin (5.03 ± 1.72). When the
two variables were associated, the highest results were obtained for
the specimens restored with fluoridated adhesive and flowable resin
(9.04 ± 1.92). Lower results were observed for non-fluoridated adhesive
+ microhybrid resin – control (4.24 ± 1.59), without statistically significant differences when compared with the fluoridated adhesive
+ microhybrid resin (5.83 ± 1.52). Conclusion: The combination
with fluoridated adhesive and flowable resin increases the shear
bond strength of bleached dentin.